


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Full Circle Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moremoneyreview.com/full-circle-review-2491.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moremoneyreview.com/full-circle-review-2491.html</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sam ward</title>
		<link>http://www.moremoneyreview.com/full-circle-review-2491.html/comment-page-1#comment-3290</link>
		<dc:creator>sam ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moremoneyreview.com/?p=2491#comment-3290</guid>
		<description>Hi Rod full circle and Breon Rawlings no go.Have seen all of rawSamlings systems and they all fail long term Strange that you can never check results without back copy&#039;s of the racing post.With ref to your own systems i have a couple of good profitable systems of my own- Want to swap
Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rod full circle and Breon Rawlings no go.Have seen all of rawSamlings systems and they all fail long term Strange that you can never check results without back copy&#8217;s of the racing post.With ref to your own systems i have a couple of good profitable systems of my own- Want to swap<br />
Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Fifield</title>
		<link>http://www.moremoneyreview.com/full-circle-review-2491.html/comment-page-1#comment-1800</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Fifield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moremoneyreview.com/?p=2491#comment-1800</guid>
		<description>Not strictly relevant to the full circle system, but the 2 spin offs I mentioned on my previous post do look very interesting. The first one should have been a nailed on backing system, but just in case I had the back on the left and the lay on the right...... After 16 days (1 a day only) excl Sundays.... backing to £100 - MINUS £804.80. Laying PLUS £724. I was so surprised that I extended the selections to normally 3-5 a day, and paper layed the lot. 7 days of selections PLUS £980. OK very early days, but for a &quot;new&quot; system, it looks a darn sight better than the &quot;proven&quot; full circle.... neither have gone into the red at all.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not strictly relevant to the full circle system, but the 2 spin offs I mentioned on my previous post do look very interesting. The first one should have been a nailed on backing system, but just in case I had the back on the left and the lay on the right&#8230;&#8230; After 16 days (1 a day only) excl Sundays&#8230;. backing to £100 &#8211; MINUS £804.80. Laying PLUS £724. I was so surprised that I extended the selections to normally 3-5 a day, and paper layed the lot. 7 days of selections PLUS £980. OK very early days, but for a &#8220;new&#8221; system, it looks a darn sight better than the &#8220;proven&#8221; full circle&#8230;. neither have gone into the red at all&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Fifield</title>
		<link>http://www.moremoneyreview.com/full-circle-review-2491.html/comment-page-1#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Fifield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moremoneyreview.com/?p=2491#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>Love to know where sportsworld find £831 profit a week. ANY profit would be welcome. Looks like another SWP failure. When my bank allows less than a £2 bet I&#039;ll have to give up.... BUT it has given me a couple of great ideas which are really looking promising as systems and they will hopefully get back my losses on this and then pay for the rubbish system I bought from SWP.....

Basically don&#039;t waste your time or money with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love to know where sportsworld find £831 profit a week. ANY profit would be welcome. Looks like another SWP failure. When my bank allows less than a £2 bet I&#8217;ll have to give up&#8230;. BUT it has given me a couple of great ideas which are really looking promising as systems and they will hopefully get back my losses on this and then pay for the rubbish system I bought from SWP&#8230;..</p>
<p>Basically don&#8217;t waste your time or money with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rae braithwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.moremoneyreview.com/full-circle-review-2491.html/comment-page-1#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>rae braithwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moremoneyreview.com/?p=2491#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>I have been with this service for just over a month and am very disappointed.If I had been betting his £100 on each selection I would be down by £2400.At £40 a month it is not worth carrying on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been with this service for just over a month and am very disappointed.If I had been betting his £100 on each selection I would be down by £2400.At £40 a month it is not worth carrying on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

